Loading…

Hox genes control homocercal caudal fin development and evolution

Ancient bony fishes had heterocercal tails, like modern sharks and sturgeons, with asymmetric caudal fins and a vertebral column extending into an elongated upper lobe. Teleost fishes, in contrast, developed a homocercal tail characterized by two separate equal-sized fin lobes and the body axis not...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science advances 2024-01, Vol.10 (3), p.eadj5991-eadj5991
Main Authors: Cumplido, Nicolás, Arratia, Gloria, Desvignes, Thomas, Muñoz-Sánchez, Salomé, Postlethwait, John H, Allende, Miguel L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ancient bony fishes had heterocercal tails, like modern sharks and sturgeons, with asymmetric caudal fins and a vertebral column extending into an elongated upper lobe. Teleost fishes, in contrast, developed a homocercal tail characterized by two separate equal-sized fin lobes and the body axis not extending into the caudal fin. A similar heterocercal-to-homocercal transition occurs during teleost ontogeny, although the underlying genetic and developmental mechanisms for either transition remain unresolved. Here, we investigated the role of genes in caudal fin formation as these genes control posterior identity in animals. Analysis of expression profiles of zebrafish paralogs and phenotypes of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants showed that double and mutants fail to form a caudal fin. Furthermore, single mutants display heterocercal-like morphologies not seen since Mesozoic fossil teleosteomorphs. Relaxation of functional constraints after the teleost genome duplication may have allowed duplicates to neo- or subfunctionalize, ultimately contributing to the evolution of a homocercal tail in teleost fishes.
ISSN:2375-2548
2375-2548
DOI:10.1126/sciadv.adj5991