Loading…

Short-term spatiotemporal variations in the aftershock sequence of the 2004 mid-Niigata prefecture earthquake

We deployed 56 temporary seismic stations within approximately a month after the occurrence of the 2004 mid-Niigata prefecture earthquake. Using manually-picked arrival data obtained from the temporary and surrounding permanent seismic stations, 1056 aftershocks have been relocated. Based on the spa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth, planets, and space planets, and space, 2005-01, Vol.57 (6), p.551-556
Main Authors: KATO, Aitaro, SAKAI, Shinichi, IWASAKI, Takaya, KANAZAWA, Toshihiko, HIRATA, Naoshi, KURASHIMO, Eiji, NAGAI, Satoru, IIDAKA, Takashi, IGARASHI, Toshihiro, YAMANAKA, Yoshiko, MUROTANI, Satoko, KAWAMURA, Tomonori
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We deployed 56 temporary seismic stations within approximately a month after the occurrence of the 2004 mid-Niigata prefecture earthquake. Using manually-picked arrival data obtained from the temporary and surrounding permanent seismic stations, 1056 aftershocks have been relocated. Based on the spatiotemporal variations in the relocated aftershocks, the cluster activities associated with the mainshock and some large aftershock events are identified. The aftershocks associated with the mainshock, the largest occurred on the two steep west-dipping planes at an angle of 60DG and approximately 5 km away. In contrast, the aftershocks following the event on Oct. 27 are aligned on east-dipping plane at a low angle of 25 deg . It is further observed that the aftershock area extended in both northeastward and southwestward directions at a later stage. The triggered seismicity around the northeast edge was more significant than that around the southwest edge. This difference could be understood by the discrepancy in the shear stress level accumulated at the dynamic shear rupture due to the mainshock.
ISSN:1343-8832
1880-5981
1880-5981
DOI:10.1186/bf03352591