Transoral robotic styloidectomy for Eagle syndrome: A systematic review

• Published in: Clinical otolaryngology 2024-05, Vol.49 (3), p.293-298
• Main Authors: Campisi, Ruggero, Caranti, Alberto, Meccariello, Giuseppe, Stringa, Luigi Marco, Bianchini, Chiara, Ciorba, Andrea, Pelucchi, Stefano, Vicini, Claudio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: eagle syndrome; eagle syndrome surgery; Females; Humans; Male; Males; Meta-analysis; Middle Aged; Ossification, Heterotopic - surgery; Patients; Robotic surgery; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods; Systematic review; Temporal Bone - abnormalities; Temporal Bone - surgery; TORS styloidectomy; transoral robotic styloidectomy; transoral robotic surgery
• ISSN: 1749-4478; 1749-4486; 1749-4486
• DOI: 10.1111/coa.14145

Objectives The aim of the study is to conduct a systematic review of the existing literature on styloidectomy performed through transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in Eagle syndrome (ES). Design and Setting Two independent reviewers (RC and AC) conducted a systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases, seeking articles on TORS performed for ES treatment. The search was conducted in July 2023. The review was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Participants The review included a total of 17 adult patients, comprising 12 females and 5 males, with an average age of 52.2 years, all diagnosed with ES. Main Outcome Measures For each patient, we assessed the overall length of the styloid process, the affected side, total intervention duration, hospitalization duration, pre and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and the presence of minor and major complications. Results We identified 4 articles describing 17 instances of TORS as a surgical treatment for ES in the literature, totaling 18 styloidectomies. The mean age of the patients was 52.2 years, with 12 females and 5 males. The average operation time, inclusive of the docking phase, was 68.8 minutes. Sixteen patients (94.1% of the total) experienced complete symptom disappearance or near‐complete resolution after surgery. One patient (5.9%) showed improvement categorized as 'non‐meaningful.' Only one case of minor complication was reported among the 17 procedures (5.9%).