Loading…
Macroscopic tumor dimension, sentinel lymph node outcome, and survival analysis among cutaneous melanoma
Background Cutaneous melanoma is characterized by a high risk of metastasis to distant organs and a substantial mortality rate. For planning treatment and assessing outcomes, the Breslow micrometric measurement is critical. The tumor macroscopic dimension is not considered a prognostic parameter in...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of dermatology 2024-06, Vol.63 (6), p.765-772 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Cutaneous melanoma is characterized by a high risk of metastasis to distant organs and a substantial mortality rate. For planning treatment and assessing outcomes, the Breslow micrometric measurement is critical. The tumor macroscopic dimension is not considered a prognostic parameter in cutaneous melanoma, although there are studies showing that tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for melanoma‐specific survival. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the macroscopic dimension of melanoma and other known prognostic factors (i.e., Breslow index, mitoses, regression, and ulceration) as predictors of sentinel lymph node outcome and survival outcome.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cross‐sectional study of 227 melanoma lesions subjected to sentinel lymph node biopsy at two Brazilian referral centers.
Results
On univariate analysis, there was a statistically significant correlation between the largest macroscopic tumor dimension and the sentinel lymph node result (P = 0.001); however, on multivariate analysis considering all evaluated parameters, there was no significant difference between the sentinel lymph node result and the tumor macroscopic dimension (P = 0.2689). Regarding melanoma‐specific survival, the macroscopic dimension showed no significant correlation (P = 0.4632) in contrast to Breslow's dimension (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0011-9059 1365-4632 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ijd.17024 |