Loading…

The association between diet quality and chrononutritional patterns in young adults

Purpose Young adults eat erratically and later in the day which may impact weight and cardiometabolic health. This cross-sectional study examined relationships between chrononutritional patterns and diet quality in two young adult populations: a university and community sample. Methods Three days of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of nutrition 2024-06, Vol.63 (4), p.1271-1281
Main Authors: Wang, Leanne, Chan, Virginia, Allman-Farinelli, Margaret, Davies, Alyse, Wellard-Cole, Lyndal, Rangan, Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Young adults eat erratically and later in the day which may impact weight and cardiometabolic health. This cross-sectional study examined relationships between chrononutritional patterns and diet quality in two young adult populations: a university and community sample. Methods Three days of dietary data were collected including food images captured using wearable cameras. Chrononutritional variables were extracted: time of first and last eating occasions, caloric midpoint (time at which 50% of daily energy was consumed), number of eating occasions per day, eating window, day-to-day variability of the above metrics, and evening eating (≥20:00h). The Healthy Eating Index for Australian Adults scored diet quality. Statistical analyses controlled for gender, body mass index, and socio-economic status. Results No significant associations between chrononutritional patterns and diet quality were found for all participants ( n  = 95). However, differences in diet quality were found between university ( n  = 54) and community ( n  = 41) samples with average diet quality scores of 59.1 (SD 9.7) and 47.3 (SD 14.4), respectively. Of those who extended eating ≥20:00 h, university participants had better diet quality (62.9±SE 2.5 vs. 44.3±SE 2.3, p  
ISSN:1436-6207
1436-6215
1436-6215
DOI:10.1007/s00394-024-03353-7