Implementation of PSMA PET/CT and alignment of ordering to SNMMI appropriate use criteria in a large network system

• Published in: The Prostate 2024-06, Vol.84 (8), p.717-722
• Main Authors: Bennett, Richard, Li, Eric V., Ho, Austin Y., Aguiar, Jonathan A., Neill, Clayton, Rowe, Steven P., Patel, Hiten D., Savas, Hatice, Ross, Ashley E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: cancer staging; Computed tomography; diagnosis; Electronic medical records; Nuclear medicine; Positron emission tomography; Prostate cancer; PSMA PET/CT; Tomography
• ISSN: 0270-4137; 1097-0045
• DOI: 10.1002/pros.24687

Introduction The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) provides appropriate use criteria (AUC) for prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) which include guidance on imaging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer and in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) disease. This study aims to examine trends in PSMA implementation and the prevalence and outcomes of scans ordered in scenarios deemed rarely appropriate or not meeting SNMMI AUC. Methods We retrospectively identified patients who were diagnosed with presumptive National Comprehensive Cancer Network unfavorable intermediate, high, or very high risk prostate cancer, patients who underwent staging for BCR, and all patients staged with PSMA between July 2021 and March 2023. Positivity was validated by adherence to a predetermined reference standard. Results The frequency of PSMA use increased in initial staging from 24% to 80% and work‐up of BCR from 91% to 99% over our study period. In addition, 5% (17/340) of PSMA scans ordered for initial staging did not meet AUC and 3% (15/557) of posttreatment scans were deemed rarely appropriate. Initial staging orders not meeting SNMMI AUC resulted in no positivity (0/17), while rarely appropriate posttreatment scans were falsely positive in 75% (3/4) of cases. Urologists (53%, 17/32) comprised the largest ordering specialty in rarely appropriate use. Conclusion The frequency of PSMA use rose across the study period. A significant minority of patients received PSMA PET/CT in rarely appropriate scenarios yielding no positivity in initial staging and significant false positivity post‐therapy. Further education of providers and electronic medical record‐based interventions could help limit the rarely appropriate use of PET imaging.