A Biopsy Procedure for Determining Filet and Predicting Whole-Fish Mercury Concentration

Although mercury contamination of fish is a widespread phenomenon, its regional evaluation is hindered by the reluctance of permitting agencies to grant collection permits, problems in securing adequate freezer space, and time to process whole, large fish or filets. We evaluated mercury concentratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology 2004-12, Vol.48 (1), p.99-107
Main Authors: Peterson, S A, Van Sickle, J, Hughes, R M, Schacher, J A, Echols, S F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal tissues
Bioaccumulation
Biopsy
Contamination
Dolphins & porpoises
Fish
Mercury
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although mercury contamination of fish is a widespread phenomenon, its regional evaluation is hindered by the reluctance of permitting agencies to grant collection permits, problems in securing adequate freezer space, and time to process whole, large fish or filets. We evaluated mercury concentrations in 210 filet biopsies from 65 sites in 12 western states relative to whole-body mercury concentration in the same fish. We found a highly significant relationship (r^sup 2^=0.96) between biopsy and whole-fish mercury concentrations for 13 piscivorous and nonpiscivorous fish species. We concluded that relative to conventional fish-tissue sampling and analysis procedures for whole fish or filets, the biopsy procedure for mercury in fish tissue is nonlethal, less cumbersome, more likely to be permitted by fisheries agencies, and a precise and accurate means for determining both filet and whole-fish mercury concentrations.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0090-4341
1432-0703
DOI:10.1007/s00244-004-0260-4