Loading…

Residual Stresses and Their Effects on the Durability of Environmental Barrier Coatings for SiC Ceramics

Qualitative residual stresses in current environmental barrier coatings (EBCs) were inferred from the curvature of EBC‐coated SiC wafers, and the effects of EBC stresses on the durability of EBC‐coated SiC were evaluated. The magnitude of substrate curvature correlated fairly well with the EBC–SiC c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Ceramic Society 2005-12, Vol.88 (12), p.3483-3488
Main Authors: Lee, Kang N., Eldridge, Jeffrey I., Robinson, Raymond C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Qualitative residual stresses in current environmental barrier coatings (EBCs) were inferred from the curvature of EBC‐coated SiC wafers, and the effects of EBC stresses on the durability of EBC‐coated SiC were evaluated. The magnitude of substrate curvature correlated fairly well with the EBC–SiC coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch, EBC modulus, and thermally induced physical changes in EBC. BSAS (1−xBaO·xSrO·Al2O3·2SiO2, 0≤x≤1) components in the current EBCs, i.e., Si/mullite or mullite+BSAS/BSAS or yttria‐stabilized zirconia (YSZ: ZrO2–8 wt% Y2O3), were the most beneficial for reducing the EBC stress in as‐sprayed as well as in post‐exposure EBCs. The reduced stress was attributed to the low modulus of BSAS. The addition of a YSZ top coat significantly increased the substrate curvature because of its high CTE and sintering in thermal exposures. There were clear correlations between the wafer curvature and the EBC durability. The Si/mullite+20 wt% BSAS/BSAS EBC maintained excellent adherence, protecting the SiC substrate from oxidation, while the Si/mullite+20 wt% BSAS/YSZ EBC suffered delamination, leading to severe oxidation of the SiC substrate, after a 100 h −1300°C exposure in a high‐pressure burner rig.
ISSN:0002-7820
1551-2916
DOI:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00640.x