A LAMP point-of-care test to guide antimicrobial choice for treatment of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius pyoderma in dogs

• Published in: The veterinary journal (1997) 2024-04, Vol.304, p.106105-106105, Article 106105
• Main Authors: Pirolo, M., Menezes, M., Poulsen, M., Søndergaard, V., Damborg, P., Poirier, A.C., La Ragione, R., Schjærff, M., Guardabassi, L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use; Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use; Antimicrobial stewardship; Diagnosis; Dog Diseases - drug therapy; Dog Diseases - microbiology; Dogs; LAMP; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - veterinary; Pyoderma - drug therapy; Pyoderma - microbiology; Pyoderma - veterinary; Skin infection; Staphylococcal Infections - veterinary; Staphylococcus; Staphylococcus pseudintermedius; Veterinary dermatology
• ISSN: 1090-0233; 1532-2971
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106105

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the most common cause of pyoderma in dogs. We validated a point-of-care (PoC) test based on colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for rapid S. pseudintermedius identification and susceptibility testing for first line antimicrobials for systemic treatment of canine pyoderma, i.e., lincosamides, first generation cephalosporins and amoxicillin clavulanate. Newly designed LAMP primers targeting clinically relevant resistance genes were combined with a previously validated set of primers targeting spsL for species identification. After laboratory validation on 110 clinical isolates, we assessed the performance of the test on 101 clinical specimens using routine culture and susceptibility testing as a reference standard. The average hands-on and turnaround times for the PoC test were 30 and 90 min, respectively. The assay showed sensitivity and specificity near 100% for both species identification and susceptibility testing when performed on bacterial cultures or clinical specimens in the laboratory. However, the PoC test yielded less accurate results when performed on-site by clinical staff (92% sensitivity and 64% specificity for species identification, 67% sensitivity and 96% specificity for β-lactam susceptibility, and 83% sensitivity and 71% specificity for lincosamide susceptibility). These results indicate that the PoC test should be adapted to a user-friendly technology to facilitate performance and interpretation of results by clinical staff. If properly developed, the test would allow veterinarians to gain rapid information on antimicrobial choice, limiting the risk of treatment failure and facilitating adherence to antimicrobial use guidelines in small animal veterinary dermatology. •A test was developed for direct antibiotic susceptibility testing on skin samples.•The average turnaround time for the assay was 90 min.•The test showed nearly 100% sensitivity and specificity in the laboratory.•Diagnostic accuracy was lower under field conditions.