Loading…

Alternative models to support weight loss in chronic musculoskeletal conditions: effectiveness of a physiotherapist-delivered intensive diet programme for knee osteoarthritis, the POWER randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesTo determine if physiotherapists can deliver a clinically effective very low energy diet (VLED) supplementary to exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and overweight or obesity.Methods88 participants with knee OA and body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m2 were randomised to either i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of sports medicine 2024-05, Vol.58 (10), p.538-547
Main Authors: Allison, Kim, Jones, Sarah, Hinman, Rana S, Pardo, Jesse, Li, Peixuan, DeSilva, Anurika, Quicke, Jonathan George, Sumithran, Priya, Prendergast, Jodie, George, Elena, Holden, Melanie A, Foster, Nadine E, Bennell, Kim L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectivesTo determine if physiotherapists can deliver a clinically effective very low energy diet (VLED) supplementary to exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and overweight or obesity.Methods88 participants with knee OA and body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m2 were randomised to either intervention (n=42: VLED including two daily meal replacement products supplementary to control) or control (n=46: exercise). Both interventions were delivered by unblinded physiotherapists via six videoconference sessions over 6 months. The primary outcome was the percentage change in body weight at 6 months, measured by a blinded assessor. Secondary outcomes included BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, self-reported measures of pain, function, satisfaction and perceived global change, and physical performance tests.ResultsThe intervention group lost a mean (SD) of 8.1% (5.2) body weight compared with 1.0% (3.2) in the control group (mean (95% CI) between-group difference 7.2% (95% CI 5.1 to 9.3), p
ISSN:0306-3674
1473-0480
1473-0480
DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2023-107793