Root cause analysis of mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter cohort study from the FREGAT database

• Published in: Surgery 2024-07, Vol.176 (1), p.82-92
• Main Authors: Levenson, Guillaume, Coutrot, Maxime, Voron, Thibault, Gronnier, Caroline, Cattan, Pierre, Hobeika, Christian, D’Journo, Xavier Benoît, Bergeat, Damien, Glehen, Olivier, Mathonnet, Muriel, Piessen, Guillaume, Goéré, Diane
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Databases, Factual; Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery; Esophagectomy - adverse effects; Esophagectomy - mortality; Female; France - epidemiology; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Root Cause Analysis
• ISSN: 0039-6060; 1532-7361; 1532-7361
• DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.012

Esophagectomy is associated with significant mortality. A better understanding of the causes leading to death may help to reduce mortality. A root cause analysis of mortality after esophagectomy was performed. Root cause analysis was retrospectively applied by an independent expert panel of 4 upper gastrointestinal surgeons and 1 anesthesiologist-intensivist to patients included in the French national multicenter prospective cohort FREGAT between August 2014 and September 2019 who underwent an esophagectomy for cancer and died within 90 days of surgery. A cause-and-effect diagram was used to determine the root causes related to death. Death was classified as potentially preventable or non-preventable. Among the 1,040 patients included in the FREGAT cohort, 70 (6.7%) patients (male: 81%, median age 68 [62–72] years) from 17 centers were included. Death was potentially preventable in 37 patients (53%). Root causes independently associated with preventable death were inappropriate indication (odds ratio 35.16 [2.50–494.39]; P = .008), patient characteristics (odds ratio 5.15 [1.19–22.35]; P = .029), unexpected intraoperative findings (odds ratio 18.99 [1.07–335.55]; P = .045), and delay in diagnosis of a complication (odds ratio 98.10 [6.24–1,541.04]; P = .001). Delay in treatment of a complication was found only in preventable deaths (28 [76%] vs 0; P < .001). National guidelines were less frequently followed (16 [43%] vs 22 [67%]; P = .050) in preventable deaths. The only independent risk factor of preventable death was center volume