Test-retest reliability and longitudinal validity of drop vertical jump biomechanics during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics 2024-06, Vol.170, p.112150, Article 112150
• Main Authors: Gagnon, Sheila S., Birmingham, Trevor B., Dickey, James P., Leitch, Kristyn, O'Neill, Lindsey, Bryant, Dianne, Robert Giffin, J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anterior cruciate ligament; Biomechanical engineering; Biomechanics; Contact angle; Correlation coefficients; Digital cameras; Drop vertical jump; Evaluation; Force; Hip; Jumping; Kinematics; Knee; Knee abduction moment; Longitudinal validity; Patients; Rehabilitation; Reliability; Reliability analysis; Surgery; Validity; Vertical forces
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380; 1873-2380
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112150

Hip and knee biomechanics measured during a drop vertical jump (DVJ) can be used to assess patients undergoing rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To confidently interpret such data for use as outcome measures, additional information about reliability and validity is required. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the test–retest reliability and longitudinal validity of selected lower limb biomechanics assessed during a DVJ in patients undergoing rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Biomechanical analysis of the DVJ in primary unilateral ACL reconstruction patients (22.3 ± 5.5y) were tested twice within 1 week at 6 months post-surgery (n = 46), and again at 12 months post-surgery (n = 36). Peak and initial contact knee angles and moments, hip impulse, vertical ground reaction forces (VGRF), isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength, and global ratings of change (GRC) were assessed. Reliability was evaluated based on the 6-month post-surgery data using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), standard errors of measurement and minimum detectable change. Longitudinal validity was evaluated by assessing change from 6 to 12 months, using standardized response means (SRM), and by assessing the correlation (Pearson’s r) of change in landing biomechanics with change in strength, and GRC. ICCs ranged from 0.58 to 0.90 for peak knee abduction and flexion moments, 0.44–0.85 for knee flexion and abduction angles, 0.82–0.93 for VGRFs, and 0.42–0.65 for hip impulse. SRMs and correlations of change ranged from 0.00 to 0.50. Reliability and longitudinal validity of DVJ measures varied, ranging from poor-to-excellent; the present results assist in their interpretation when assessed during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction.