Increasing the accuracy of exchange parameters reporting on slow dynamics by performing CEST experiments with ‘high’ B1 fields

• Published in: Journal of magnetic resonance (1997) 2024-06, Vol.363, p.107699, Article 107699
• Main Authors: Khandave, Nihar Pradeep, Hansen, D. Flemming, Vallurupalli, Pramodh
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: CEST; Chemical Exchange; Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer; Conformational Exchange; FF domain; NMR; Protein Dynamics
• ISSN: 1090-7807; 1096-0856; 1096-0856
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107699

[Display omitted] •The transverse relaxation rate of the minor state resonance R2,B plays a critical role in determining the B1 fields that lead to the most informative CEST datasets.•To obtain accurate exchange parameters, K=kexkex+R2,B12 rather than the exchange rate (kex) should guide the choice of B1 (~0.7K & ~1.7K) fields used to record CEST experiments.•When R2,B is greater than kex, CEST datasets recorded with ‘large’ B1 fields ≫kex/2π are required to obtain accurate exchange parameters. Over the last decade chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) NMR methods have emerged as powerful tools to characterize biomolecular conformational dynamics occurring between a visible major state and ‘invisible’ minor states. The ability of the CEST experiment to detect these minor states, and provide precise exchange parameters, hinges on using appropriate B1 field strengths during the saturation period. Typically, a pair of B1 fields with ω1 (=2πB1) values around the exchange rate kex are chosen. Here we show that the transverse relaxation rate of the minor state resonance (R2,B) also plays a crucial role in determining the B1 fields that lead to the most informative datasets. Using K=kexkex+R2,B12 ≥ kex, to guide the choice of B1, instead of kex, leads to data wherefrom substantially more accurate exchange parameters can be derived. The need for higher B1 fields, guided by K, is demonstrated by studying the conformational exchange in two mutants of the 71 residue FF domain with kex ∼ 11 s−1 and ∼ 72 s−1, respectively. In both cases analysis of CEST datasets recorded using B1 field values guided by kex lead to imprecise exchange parameters, whereas using B1 values guided by K resulted in precise site-specific exchange parameters. The conclusions presented here will be valuable while using CEST to study slow processes at sites with large intrinsic relaxation rates, including carbonyl sites in small to medium sized proteins, amide 15N sites in large proteins and when the minor state dips are broadened due to exchange among the minor states.