What outcomes do patients value after orthopaedic trauma: A best-worst scaling choice experiment

• Published in: Injury 2024-08, Vol.55 (8), p.111639, Article 111639
• Main Authors: Parry, Joshua A., Patterson, Joseph T., O'Hara, Nathan N.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adverse events; Best-Worst scaling; Clinical outcomes; Complications; EQ-5D; Orthopaedic trauma; Patient preference; Patient-reported outcome measures
• ISSN: 0020-1383; 1879-0267; 1879-0267
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111639

•Patients and surgeons prefer a full recovery (back to normal) without any problems more than other outcomes after musculoskeletal trauma.•The next most preferred outcomes were minimal/moderate pain for 6 weeks and a perfect EQ-5D score at one year.•Surgeons perceived more value than patients in a perfect EQ-5D score and spending a shorter period, 2 to 4 weeks, in a facility during recovery. Patient-centered treatment and research should focus on the outcomes that matter to patients. The primary aim of this study was to determine the outcome preferences of patients after musculoskeletal trauma. The secondary aim was to identify discrepancies between outcome preferences of surgeons and patients. A Best-worst scaling choice experiment survey was administered to patients with operative lower extremity injuries and orthopaedic surgeons who take trauma call. Participants completed 13 choice sets of 3 randomly-ordered outcomes, including: a full recovery (back to normal) without any problems; a problem that requires additional surgery or hospital stay versus medication or treatment in clinic/emergency department; minimal to moderate versus severe pain for 6 weeks; need for crutches/walker versus wheelchair for 6–12 weeks; being unable to work for 6–12 weeks; requiring 2–4 weeks in a facility; a perfect versus poor or worst-possible EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score at 1 year; and death. Within each set, participants ranked their “most-preferred” to “least-preferred” outcomes. Responses were aggregated to calculate the relative importance, or marginal utility, of each outcome stratified by respondent type. Fifty-five patients and 65 surgeons participated. The most preferred outcome for patients and surgeons was a full recovery (back to normal) without any problems, followed by minimal to moderate pain for 6 weeks and a perfect EQ-5D score. The least preferred outcomes were death and the worst EQ-5D score, which had similar marginal utility, followed by a poor EQ-5D score and a problem that needs another surgery or stay at a hospital, which also had similar marginal utility. Surgeons, in comparison to patients, assigned a higher marginal utility to perfect EQ-5D scores at one year (3.55 vs. 2.03; p < 0.0001) and a 2–4 week stay in a facility (0.52 vs. -0.21; p = 0.001), and a lower marginal utility to severe pain for 6 weeks (-0.58 vs. -0.08; p = 0.04) and a poor EQ-5D score (-1.88 vs. -1.03; p = 0.02). A full recovery (back to normal) without any problems was the