Loading…

Association between skin suture devices and incidence of incisional surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common complications after abdominal surgery. To compare which suture devices could reduce the incidence of incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) after gastrointestinal surgery using a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The CENTRAL, PubMed, and ICHU...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of hospital infection 2024-08, Vol.150, p.134-144
Main Authors: Kouzu, K., Kabata, D., Shinkawa, H., Shinji, S., Ishinuki, T., Tamura, K., Uchino, M., Ohge, H., Shimizu, J., Haji, S., Mohri, Y., Yamashita, C., Kitagawa, Y., Suzuki, K., Kobayashi, M., Hanai, Y., Nobuhara, H., Imaoka, H., Yoshida, M., Mizuguchi, T., Mayumi, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common complications after abdominal surgery. To compare which suture devices could reduce the incidence of incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) after gastrointestinal surgery using a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The CENTRAL, PubMed, and ICHUSHI-Web databases were searched from January 1st, 2000, to December 31st, 2022, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the incidence of incisional SSI after gastrointestinal surgery among patients treated with different surgical suture devices, including non-absorbable sutures, absorbable sutures, skin staplers, and tissue adhesives (last searched in August 23th, 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. To estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for each comparison, a fixed-effect inverse-variance model based on the Mantel–Haenszel approach was employed. A total of 18 RCTs with 5496 patients were included in this study. The overall SSIs in absorbable sutures were significantly lower than those in skin staplers (OR: 0.77; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.63–0.95) and non-absorbable sutures (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39–0.99), whereas SSIs in absorbable sutures were not significantly different from the SSIs in tissue adhesive. The highest P-score was 0.91 for absorbable sutures. A funnel plot for estimating the heterogeneity of the studies revealed that a publication bias would be minimal (Egger test, P = 0.271). This study showed that absorbable sutures reduced incisional SSIs in gastrointestinal surgical operations compared to any other suture devices.
ISSN:0195-6701
1532-2939
1532-2939
DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.04.029