Loading…

Comparative Bioequivalence Study of 2 Clopidogrel 75‐mg Tablet Formulations in Moroccan Volunteers

This study investigates the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of clopidogrel tablets administered to a cohort of healthy Moroccan male volunteers. The primary objective was to assess the rate and extent of drug absorption from the test formulation in comparison to a ref...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical pharmacology in drug development 2024-09, Vol.13 (9), p.1044-1050
Main Authors: Orche, Aimen El, Khabbaz, Choukri El, Cheikh, Amine, Bouchafra, Houda, Jawhari, Samira, Abbes, Faouzi My El, Cherrah, Yahya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigates the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of clopidogrel tablets administered to a cohort of healthy Moroccan male volunteers. The primary objective was to assess the rate and extent of drug absorption from the test formulation in comparison to a reference formulation, focusing on critical parameters including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration‐time curve from 0 to the last measurable time (AUC0‐t), and area under the concentration‐time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0‐∞). The results revealed that the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0‐t, and AUC0–∞ for the test formulation relative to the reference formulation were 105.7%, 105.6%, and 105.6%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals for these parameters fell within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80%‐125%, indicating a statistically and clinically equivalent performance between the 2 formulations. This investigation sheds light on the pharmacokinetic behavior of clopidogrel in the context of the Moroccan male population, offering valuable insights into the comparability of formulations.
ISSN:2160-763X
2160-7648
2160-7648
DOI:10.1002/cpdd.1442