Loading…

Variable Duration Trial as an Alternative Design for Continuous Endpoints

ABSTRACT Clinical trials with continuous primary endpoints typically measure outcomes at baseline, at a fixed timepoint (denoted T min), and at intermediate timepoints. The analysis is commonly performed using the mixed model repeated measures method. It is sometimes expected that the effect size wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pharmaceutical statistics : the journal of the pharmaceutical industry 2024-11, Vol.23 (6), p.1059-1064
Main Authors: Ganju, Jitendra, Ma, Julie Guoguang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Clinical trials with continuous primary endpoints typically measure outcomes at baseline, at a fixed timepoint (denoted T min), and at intermediate timepoints. The analysis is commonly performed using the mixed model repeated measures method. It is sometimes expected that the effect size will be larger with follow‐up longer than T min. But extending the follow‐up for all patients delays trial completion. We propose an alternative trial design and analysis method that potentially increases statistical power without extending the trial duration or increasing the sample size. We propose following the last enrolled patient until T min, with earlier enrollees having variable follow‐up durations up to a maximum of T max. The sample size at T max will be smaller than at T min, and due to staggered enrollment, data missing at T max will be missing completely at random. For analysis, we propose an alpha‐adjusted procedure based on the smaller of the p values at T min and T max, termed minP . This approach can provide the highest power when the powers at T min and T max are similar. If the power at T min and T max differ significantly, the power of minP is modestly reduced compared with the larger of the two powers. Rare disease trials, due to the limited size of the patient population, may benefit the most with this design.
ISSN:1539-1604
1539-1612
1539-1612
DOI:10.1002/pst.2418