Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in adolescents with overweight or obesity with or without type 2 diabetes multimorbidity—a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

• Published in: Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2024-10, Vol.26 (10), p.4302-4317
• Main Authors: Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib, Patil, Amol N., Amin, Ulfat, Roy, Tuli, Tiwari, Krishna, Husain, Noor, Kumar, Jogender, Chenchula, Santenna, Rao, Priyanka, Ganesh, Venkata, Varthya, Shoban Babu, Singh, Surjit, Shukla, Ravindra, Rastogi, Ashu, Gandhi, Aravind P., Satapathy, Prakisini, Sah, Ranjit, Padhi, Bijaya Kumar, Dwivedi, Pradeep, Khunti, Kamlesh
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adipose tissue; adolescent/teen; Adolescents; Agonists; Body fat; Body mass index; Body weight; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent); GLP-1 receptor agonists; Glucagon; glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists; Meta-analysis; metabolic control; Obesity; Overweight; Peptides; Systematic review; Teenagers; weight loss
• ISSN: 1462-8902; 1463-1326; 1463-1326
• DOI: 10.1111/dom.15777

Aim To synthesize the evidence on the effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) in adolescents with overweight or obesity. Materials and Methods For this systematic review and network meta‐analysis, we searched five databases and registries until 2 March 2024 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was weight change. We did a pairwise meta‐analysis to compare GLP‐1RAs and placebo, followed by a drug‐wise network meta‐analysis (NMA) to compare GLP‐1RAs against each other. Results We screened 770 records to include 12 RCTs with 883 participants. The evidence suggests that GLP‐1RAs reduced weight (mean difference −4.21 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] −7.08 to −1.35) and body mass index (BMI; mean difference −2.11 kg/m2, 95% CI −3.60 to −0.62). The evidence on waist circumference, body fat percentage and adverse events (AEs) was very uncertain. The results remained consistent with subgroup analyses for coexisting type 2 diabetes. Longer therapy duration led to a greater reduction in weight and BMI. In the NMA, semaglutide led to the greatest weight reduction, followed by exenatide, liraglutide and lixisenatide. Conclusions The evidence suggests that GLP‐1RAs reduce most weight‐related outcomes in adolescents, with semaglutide being the most efficacious. There is uncertain evidence on body fat and serious AEs, probably due to fewer studies and low incidence, respectively. Larger RCTs with head‐to‐head comparisons, pragmatic design, adiposity‐related outcomes, and economic evaluation can further guide the use and choice of GLP‐1RAs.