Loading…

Repeatability of alkaline inorganic phosphate quantification in the skeletal muscle using 31P‐magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T

The detection of a secondary inorganic phosphate (Pi) resonance, a possible marker of mitochondrial content in vivo, using phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P‐MRS), poses technical challenges at 3 Tesla (T). Overcoming these challenges is imperative for the integration of this biomarker...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NMR in biomedicine 2024-12, Vol.37 (12), p.e5255-n/a
Main Authors: Matias, Alexs A., Serviente, Corinna F., Decker, Stephen T., Erol, Muhammet Enes, Giuriato, Gaia, Le Fur, Yann, Nagarajan, Rajakumar, Bendahan, David, Layec, Gwenael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The detection of a secondary inorganic phosphate (Pi) resonance, a possible marker of mitochondrial content in vivo, using phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P‐MRS), poses technical challenges at 3 Tesla (T). Overcoming these challenges is imperative for the integration of this biomarker into clinical research. To evaluate the repeatability and reliability of measuring resting skeletal muscle alkaline Pi (Pialk) using with 31P‐MRS at 3 T. After an initial set of experiments on five subjects to optimize the sequence, resting 31P‐MRS of the quadriceps muscles were acquired on two visits (~4 days apart) using an intra‐subjects design, from 13 sedentary to moderately active young male and female adults (22 ± 3 years old) within a whole‐body 3 T MR system. Measurement variability attributed to changes in coil position, shimming procedure, and spectral analysis were quantified. 31P‐MRS data were acquired with a 31P/‐proton (1H) dual‐tuned surface coil positioned on the quadriceps using a pulse‐acquire sequence. Test–retest absolute and relative repeatability was analyzed using the coefficient of variation (CV) and intra‐class correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively. After sequence parameter optimization, Pialk demonstrated high intra‐subject repeatability (CV: 10.6 ± 5.4%, ICC: 0.80). Proximo‐distal change in coil position along the length of the quadriceps introduced Pialk quantitation variability (CV: 28 ± 5%), due to magnetic field inhomogeneity with more distal coil locations. In contrast, Pialk measurement variability due to repeated shims from the same muscle volume (0.40 ± 0.09mM; CV: 6.6%), and automated spectral processing (0.37 ± 0.01mM; CV: 2.3%), was minor. The quantification of Pialk in skeletal muscle via surface coil 31P‐MRS at 3 T demonstrated excellent reproducibility. However, caution is advised against placing the coil at the distal part of the quadriceps to mitigate shimming inhomogeneity. Resting [Pialk] demonstrated a good test–retest reproducibility CV of 10.6% (A.). Shimming (CV = 6.6%; B.) and spectral processing (CV ≤ 2.3%; C.) accounted for a limited portion of Pialk measurement variability. The present study supports the reproducibility of Pialk quantification in skeletal muscle by 31P MRS using at 3 T.
ISSN:0952-3480
1099-1492
1099-1492
DOI:10.1002/nbm.5255