Loading…

Birthweight influences liver structure, function and disease risk: Evidence of a causal association

Aim Low birthweight is an issue during pregnancy associated with an increased risk of developing liver disease later in life. Previous Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies which explored this issue have not isolated the direct impact of the foetus on birthweight. In the present study, MR was used to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2024-11, Vol.26 (11), p.4976-4988
Main Authors: Peng, Lei, Shen, Jiajia, Li, Lurong, Liu, Jiahao, Jiang, Xingzhou, Zhang, Guoxin, Li, Yuanyuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim Low birthweight is an issue during pregnancy associated with an increased risk of developing liver disease later in life. Previous Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies which explored this issue have not isolated the direct impact of the foetus on birthweight. In the present study, MR was used to assess whether direct foetal effects on birthweight were causally associated with liver structure, function and disease risk independent of intrauterine effects. Materials and Methods We extracted single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) about direct foetal‐affected birthweight (321 223 cases) to conduct univariable and multivariable MR analyses to explore the relationships between birthweight and 4 liver structure measures, 9 liver function measures and 18 liver diseases. A two‐step MR analysis was used to further assess and quantify the mediating effects of the mediators. Results When isolating direct foetal effects, genetically predicted lower birthweight was associated with a higher risk of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (odds ratios [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61, 1.29–2.02, p 
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.15910