Loading…

Research degree examining - common principles and divergent practices

Reports on discussions that took place at a series of specialist seminars and workshops on research degree examining organised by the UK Council for Graduate Education during 2000 2001 at various venues in the UK. Debates the processes and procedures of research degree examination in the UK in terms...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quality assurance in education 2002-06, Vol.10 (2), p.104-115
Main Authors: Powell, Stuart, McCauley, Claire
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Reports on discussions that took place at a series of specialist seminars and workshops on research degree examining organised by the UK Council for Graduate Education during 2000 2001 at various venues in the UK. Debates the processes and procedures of research degree examination in the UK in terms of variations in practice that exist along with principles that signal a common identity. Takes account of the effects of developments in, for example, professional doctorates and the PhD by published work and on perceptions of the "traditional" examination. Issues addressed include: the composition of PhD examining panels and the roles of individual examiners; the training and qualification of examiners; the purpose and nature of the oral examination; the tension between examination of the process of training and that of the "finished product" (which the thesis may be seen to represent). Argues for the need for more transparency about examination processes, for challenge to common assumptions and for a refocusing on research degree examination as a process of assessment.
ISSN:0968-4883
1758-7662
DOI:10.1108/09684880210423591