The influence of crop type on pesticide wash‐off parameters for use in environmental fate modelling

• Published in: Pest management science 2024-12, Vol.80 (12), p.6519-6526
• Main Authors: Hand, Laurence, Patterson, David, Reinken, Gerald, Schriever, Carola, Volz, Petra, Rieder, Benjamin, Essing, Marius
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cereal crops; Confidence intervals; Crops; Crops, Agricultural - growth & development; environmental fate; fate modelling; Fluid dynamics; foliar wash‐off; French beans; Fungicides; Fungicides, Industrial - analysis; Hydrophilicity; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Hydrophobicity; Laboratories; Leaves; Models, Theoretical; pesticide risk assessment; Pesticides; Physical simulation; Plant layout; Plant Leaves - chemistry; Plant protection; Rain; Rainfall; Simulated rainfall; Soil testing; Soil water; Surface water; Tebuconazole; Triazoles; Wettability
• ISSN: 1526-498X; 1526-4998; 1526-4998
• DOI: 10.1002/ps.8389

BACKGROUND Wash‐off of plant protection products from crops is represented in current European Union (EU) surface water models and future EU soil models by a coefficient that estimates its contribution to soil loadings following rainfall. Replacing the default coefficient with experimental data requires a harmonized protocol and this research forms part of the development of such a protocol. Following a successful test of the proposed protocol on a single crop across eight laboratories, a range of crops were tested in a single laboratory to assess the impact of crop type on the results. RESULTS Six crops (wheat, rice, oil seed rape, cabbage, potato and French bean) were chosen, encompassing both hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces. Tebuconazole (Folicur EW 250) was sprayed onto plants at a rate equivalent to 100 g ai ha−1 and subjected to a 1‐h simulated rainfall event at an intensity of 20 mm h−1. Measured residues before and after rainfall were compared to calculate the percentage wash‐off. The extent of wash‐off was 66.4% with a 95% confidence interval of ±18.5% and the results were clustered according to leaf wettability, with lower wash‐off in hydrophobic crops than in hydrophilic crops. CONCLUSION Wash‐off of this unoptimized formulation was similar across the crops, despite the use of crops with both hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces. There is potential, therefore, to rationalize the number of crops used in future studies by selecting a small number of hydrophilic and/or hydrophobic crops to obtain a robust estimation of the extent of wash‐off for use in environmental fate models. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry. A new protocol for determining foliar wash‐off demonstrated similar wash‐off for an unoptimized formulation of tebuconazole across a range of crop types, with differentiation between hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces.