The factors associated with the provision of public access defibrillation in Japan − A nationwide cohort study

• Published in: Resuscitation 2024-10, Vol.203, p.110386, Article 110386
• Main Authors: Nakagawa, Koshi, Sagisaka, Ryo, Morioka, Daigo, Kimura, Ryu, Kijima, Hinata, Tanaka, Hideharu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Automated external defibrillator; Basic life support; Bystander; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Public access defibrillation
• ISSN: 0300-9572; 1873-1570; 1873-1570
• DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110386

The association between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and the appropriate provision of public access defibrillation (PAD) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with whether or not PAD was provided. This retrospective cohort study utilized the All-Japan Utstein and Emergency Transport Registries in 2021. We included OHCA patients who were applied to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) by bystanders and were deemed eligible for defibrillation by an AED. We defined PAD provided or no PAD provided based on bystander defibrillation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with the Firth bias adjustment method was employed to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the exploratory evaluation of factors associated with PAD provided. 1949 patients were eligible for analysis (PAD provided, n = 1696 [87.0%]; no PAD provided, n = 253 [13.0%]). Factors positively associated with PAD provided were male (AOR [95% CI], 1.61 [1.17–2.21]; vs. female), other public place incidence (AOR [95% CI], 10.65 [1.40–1367.54]; vs. public place), non-family member witnessed (AOR [95% CI], 2.51 [1.86–3.42]; vs. unwitnessed) and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), (AOR [95% CI], 1.75 [1.17–2.67]; vs. hands-only CPR). Conversely, factors negatively associated with no PAD provided were over 65 years old (AOR [95% CI], 0.48 [0.28–0.80]; vs. 19–64 yr), night-time onset (AOR [95% CI], 0.61 [0.45–0.83]; vs. daytime), non-cardiogenic (AOR [95% CI], 0.43 [0.31–0.61]; vs. cardiogenic), home setting (AOR [95% CI], 0.33 [0.14–0.83]; vs. public place), healthcare facility setting (AOR [95% CI], 0.40 [0.23–0.66]; vs. public place), no bystander CPR (AOR [95% CI], 0.31 [0.14–0.71]; vs. hands-only CPR), and dispatcher-assistance (AOR [95% CI], 0.72 [0.53–0.97]; vs. no dispatcher-assistance). Male patients, other public place onset, witnessed by non-family and conventional CPR were associated with PAD provide. Therefore, training skilled first responders to use AEDs appropriately is necessary.