Barriers and facilitators to adopting safe farm-machine related behaviors: A focus group study exploring older farmers’ perspectives

• Published in: Journal of safety research 2024-09, Vol.90, p.19-30
• Main Authors: Surendran, Aswathi, McSharry, Jenny, Meade, Oonagh, Meredith, David, McNamara, John, Bligh, Francis, O’Hora, Denis
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accidents, Occupational - prevention & control; Aged; Agriculture; Decision Making; Farm safety; Farmers - psychology; Farmers - statistics & numerical data; Farms; Female; Focus group; Focus Groups; Humans; Ireland; Male; Middle Aged; Motivation; Occupational Health; Qualitative Research; Qualitative study; Tractor
• ISSN: 0022-4375; 1879-1247; 1879-1247
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.009

Background: Tractors and quad bikes pose a significant risk of fatal injuries among farmers, particularly affecting older farmers. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to the adoption of machine related safety behaviors among older farmers in Irish farm settings. Method: Four focus groups were conducted via Zoom in February 2021. Nineteen Irish farmers from four farm types participated. The discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using an inductive, reflexive thematic analysis approach. The themes identified were then mapped to the COM-B (Capability-Opportunity-Motivation) model, providing a systematic theoretical basis for designing a future intervention to reduce machine-related accidents. Results: The analysis identified five inductive themes that encompassed both barriers and facilitators in farm safety practices: (1) Capability to manage competing responsibilities; (2) Characteristics of the farm and its work environment; (3) Availability and affordability of resources; (4) Prevailing sociocultural opportunities; and (5) Perceived likelihood and cost-benefit analysis in safety decision-making. These themes captured the complex interplay of capability, opportunity, and motivation in farmers’ decision-making processes. The study also revealed limitations in existing interventions, such as voluntary guidelines and educational methods, in effectively addressing these barriers. Conclusions: Farmers’ abilities (capability), prevailing sociocultural factors, resource availability (opportunity), and their perceived consequences and benefits (motivation) affect how safely they work with machines. The study emphasizes the need for comprehensive, theory-driven approaches that consider the interplay of capability, opportunity, and motivational factors that may support or impede machine safety. Understanding the challenges faced by Irish farmers highlights potential strategies for safety intervention, and these strategies should be co-designed with farmers and attentive to the local context. Practical applications: The study provides a template for understanding farmers’ perspectives using the COM-B model. The findings can inform the development of theoretically informed intervention strategies based on the Behavior Change Wheel framework.