Loading…
T1 Pelvic and Lumbar Pelvic Angles Normative Values: A Prospective Cohort Study of 472 Asymptomatic Volunteers
Cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort. Determine the normative values of the T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA) and Lumbar Pelvic Angle (LPA) in an asymptomatic cohort of volunteers. The TPA and LPA have been introduced as sagittal spino-pelvic parameters to guide correction of adult spinal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2024-09 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort.
Determine the normative values of the T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA) and Lumbar Pelvic Angle (LPA) in an asymptomatic cohort of volunteers.
The TPA and LPA have been introduced as sagittal spino-pelvic parameters to guide correction of adult spinal deformity. Suggested values for these parameters were derived from linear regressions based on Oswestry Disability Index scores from adult spinal deformity patients. While a few studies have evaluated the normative value of TPA, none have evaluated the LPA in asymptomatic individuals.
TPA and LPA were measured on radiographs of 472 asymptomatic volunteers between 20 and 40 years old. TPA and LPA were calculated as originally described from the centroid of T1 and L1 respectively, to the center of the femoral head to the midpoint of the sacral endplate. TPA and LPA were also evaluated using the midpoint of the superior endpoint as a surrogate to the centroid of the vertebra to compare these two measurement techniques.
TPA and LPA normative values were respectively 7.3 [6.8-7.8] and 6.3o [5.9-6.7]. There was no statistically significant difference between using the centroid of T1 or L1 versus using the midpoint of the superior endplate with respective results of 7.5o [7.0-8.0] (P=0.55) and 6.1o [5.6-6.5] (P=0.43). TPA was significantly different between Roussouly types 1-2-3 versus type 4 with respective results of of 6.7o, 7.2o, 6.5o and 9.2o (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0362-2436 1528-1159 1528-1159 |
DOI: | 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005157 |