Loading…

Standardizing Multidisciplinary Case Conferences and Improving Communication Between Referring Physicians and Radiologists: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Assess the effectiveness of standardizing multidisciplinary case conferences (MDCs). Anonymous electronic surveys gauged opinions of abdominal radiologists engaged in recurring MDCs. A standardized Excel template, following Cancer Care Ontario guidelines and relevant literature, was distributed to M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Association of Radiologists journal 2024-09, p.8465371241281055
Main Authors: Elias, Zeyad, Tarique, Usman, Veit-Haibach, Patrick, Kielar, Ania Z
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Assess the effectiveness of standardizing multidisciplinary case conferences (MDCs). Anonymous electronic surveys gauged opinions of abdominal radiologists engaged in recurring MDCs. A standardized Excel template, following Cancer Care Ontario guidelines and relevant literature, was distributed to MDC managers. Physicians were instructed to send cases 36 hours prior to MDC. Template adherence was assessed at 1.5 and 8 months. A follow-up survey at 4 months evaluated the intervention's effectiveness. 27/34 abdominal radiologists provided 47 baseline responses, and 12 delegated radiologists provided 23 follow-up responses. "Often/always" being provided the image's location increased from 36% (17/47) at baseline to 70% (16/23) at follow-up. Non-adherence to the 36-hour cut-off decreased from 36% (16/45) to 17% (4/23). 72% disagreed that uploading remote imaging to hospital servers is easy (33/46), similar to follow-up (18/23, 78%). In assessing the intervention, 41% noted improved standardization (9/22), another 41% considered MDCs already standardized (9/22), and 18% reported no change (4/22). Those reporting no change experienced a higher frequency of non-adherence to the 36-hour cut-off (3/4, 75%) than others (1/18, 6%), and less frequent "often/always" ratings for image location being provided (3/4, 75%) than others (2/18, 11%). 89% (25/28) of MDCs adhered to the template. Issues regarding last-minute add-on cases may be mitigated through EPIC force functions. Artificial intelligence advancements may assist in retrieving external images and patient information. Adherence to MDC standardization was high, allowing for more efficient preparation, potentially reducing radiologist administrative burdens. Future force functions and artificial intelligence integration into electronic patient records may further augment this.
ISSN:0846-5371
1488-2361
1488-2361
DOI:10.1177/08465371241281055