Loading…

Microbubble-laden aerosols improve post-nasal aerosol penetration efficiency in a preterm neonate model

[Display omitted] Nebulized lung surfactant therapy has been a neonatology long-pursued goal. Nevertheless, many clinical trials have yet to show a clear clinical efficacy of nebulized surfactant, which, in part, is due to the technical challenges of delivering aerosols to the lungs of preterm neona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of pharmaceutics 2024-12, Vol.666, p.124772, Article 124772
Main Authors: Min, Hyunhong J., Cheng, Xinghao, Payne, Stephen J., Stride, Eleanor P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] Nebulized lung surfactant therapy has been a neonatology long-pursued goal. Nevertheless, many clinical trials have yet to show a clear clinical efficacy of nebulized surfactant, which, in part, is due to the technical challenges of delivering aerosols to the lungs of preterm neonates. The study aimed to test microbubbles for improving lung deposition in preterm neonates. An in vitro testing method was developed to replicate the clinical environment; it used a 3D-printed preterm neonate model, connected to a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and a vibrating mesh nebulizer. The flow rate of the HFNC mirrored that used in the clinics (i.e., 4, 6, and 8 L/min). Followingly, the lung penetrations of aerosols with and without microbubbles were compared. The aerodynamic diameter of aerosols with microbubbles (MMAD=1.75 μm) was lower than that of the counterpart (MMAD=2.25 μm). Microbubble-laden aerosols had a significantly higher number of microbubbles that were below 1.0 μm. Microbubble-laden aerosols had dramatically higher lung penetration in the preterm model; lung penetration efficiencies were 30.0, 25.5, and 17.5 % at 4, 6, and 8 L/min, respectively, whereas the lung penetration efficiency for conventionally nebulized aerosols was below 1.25 % in the three flow rates.
ISSN:0378-5173
1873-3476
1873-3476
DOI:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124772