Loading…
3D-Printed-Cryogel-Impregnated Functionalized Scaffold Augments Bone Regeneration in Critical Tibia Fracture in Goat
Critical-size bone trauma injuries present a significant clinical challenge because of the limited availability of autografts. In this study, a photocurable composite comprising of polycaprolactone, polypropylene fumarate, and nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAP) (P─P─H) is printed, which shows good osteocond...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advanced healthcare materials 2024-09, p.e2402619 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Critical-size bone trauma injuries present a significant clinical challenge because of the limited availability of autografts. In this study, a photocurable composite comprising of polycaprolactone, polypropylene fumarate, and nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAP) (P─P─H) is printed, which shows good osteoconduction in a rat model. A cryogel composed of gelatin-nHAP (GH) is developed to incorporate osteogenic components, specifically bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and zoledronic acid (ZA), termed as GH+B+Z, which is investigated for osteoinductive property in a rat model. Further, a 3D-printed P─P─H scaffold impregnated with GH+B+Z is designed and implanted in a critical-size defect (25 × 10 × 5 mm) in goat tibia. After 4 months, the scaffold is well-integrated with adjacent native bone, with osteoinduction observed in the cryogel-filled region and osteoconduction over the printed scaffold. X-ray radiography and micro-CT analysis showed bone in-growth in the treatment group with 45 ± 1.4% bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), while the defect remained unhealed in the control group with BV/TV of 10.5 ± 0.5%. Histology showed significant cell infiltration and matrix deposition over the printed P─P─H scaffold and within the GH cryogel site in the treatment group. Immunohistochemical staining depicted significantly higher normalized collagen I intensity in the treatment group (34.45 ± 2.61%) compared to the control group (4.22 ± 0.78). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2192-2640 2192-2659 2192-2659 |
DOI: | 10.1002/adhm.202402619 |