Loading…

A feasibility study on active sound reduction across an acoustic plenum window by cancelling source clusters on internal periphery of the window cavity

The possibility of applying active control to reduce sound transmission across a practical plenum window is examined experimentally in the present study using measured transfer functions of all related sound transmission paths. As a result of the limited space within the window, the error microphone...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2024-10, Vol.156 (4), p.2155-2168
Main Authors: Chan, P. Y., Tang, S. K., Cheung, Chi-Chung, Mui, K. W., Fu, S. C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The possibility of applying active control to reduce sound transmission across a practical plenum window is examined experimentally in the present study using measured transfer functions of all related sound transmission paths. As a result of the limited space within the window, the error microphones are located at the indoor window opening while the secondary cancelling sources are mounted along the periphery of the window void. Results show that the cancelling sources near the outdoor window opening corners and within the overlapping region of the window play more useful roles in the control. Also, the highest sound reduction is around 6 dB with six error microphones positioned either at the central region or along the periphery of the indoor window opening. However, the results with the central error microphones suggest the possibility of adopting a dual control system to enhance the low frequency performance. Control systems with fewer error microphones result in lower sound reduction. Besides, it is found that four cancelling sources, located around the outdoor opening of the window, will be enough to achieve meaningful active sound transmission reduction between 100 and 1000 Hz. Involving more cancelling sources does not result in better performance despite the added complexity.
ISSN:0001-4966
1520-8524
1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/10.0030407