Loading…

Deficits in recovery of postural stability after stepping are limb- and phase-specific in children with unilateral cerebral palsy

Recovery of postural stability after taking a step is necessary to maintain functional mobility. Although children with cerebral palsy (CP) are at an increased risk of falling, their ability to recover stability following a step is unknown. This study aimed to validate a method to assess step recove...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gait & posture 2024-10, Vol.114, p.227-233
Main Authors: Campbell, Katelyn S., Whitten, Sydni V.W., Newell, Karl M., Li, Li, Singh, Tarkeshwar, Khan, Owais A., Modlesky, Christopher M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recovery of postural stability after taking a step is necessary to maintain functional mobility. Although children with cerebral palsy (CP) are at an increased risk of falling, their ability to recover stability following a step is unknown. This study aimed to validate a method to assess step recovery in children with unilateral CP and determine if recovery of postural stability differs between limbs and across phases of step recovery. Children with unilateral CP and matched typically developing controls (5–11 y; n=20/group) stood still on force platforms (quiet stance) and completed a forward step with their more-affected limb. Step recovery was divided into dynamic and static phases using vertical ground reaction force. Postural stability was assessed using center of pressure (COP) sample entropy, distance, and velocity of the more-affected (stepping) and less-affected (trailing) limbs in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. Vertical ground reaction force during the static phase of step recovery and during quiet stance were not different for either limb and were strongly related (intraclass correlations >0.97, p
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.09.013