The effect of restricted and free-living conditions on light exposure and sleep in older adults

• Published in: Chronobiology international 2024-11, Vol.41 (11), p.1411-1421
• Main Authors: Pun, Teha B, Rahimi, Matthew, Wassing, Rick, Phillips, Craig L, Marshall, Nathaniel S, Comas, Maria, D'Rozario, Angela L, Hoyos, Camilla M, Grunstein, Ron R, Gordon, Christopher J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Actigraphy; Aged; Circadian Rhythm - physiology; COVID-19; Exercise - physiology; Female; Humans; Light; Male; Middle Aged; SARS-CoV-2; Sleep - physiology; Sleep Quality; Wakefulness - physiology
• ISSN: 0742-0528; 1525-6073; 1525-6073
• DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2024.2419849

During the COVID-19 pandemic, studies reported that restricted living conditions were associated with worse subjective sleep quality. This effect might have been caused by reduced light exposure during lockdowns. We investigated light exposure levels, subjective and objective sleep and physical activity levels in older adults during restricted and free-living conditions after the pandemic. Ninety-one participants (62.7 ± 8.4 years) recruited from the community using social media with 44 participants (63.4 ± 8.9 years) completed follow-up during free-living conditions. Participants wore an actigraphy device and completed sleep diaries for 7 days during each condition. Light values were extracted in hourly bins across the 24-h period and objective and subjective sleep were compared between the conditions. There was an increase in mean 24-h light exposure during restricted-living (1103.7 ± 1024.8 lux) compared to free-living (803.0 ± 803.6 lux;  1,000 lux) during wakefulness in restricted living (2.6 ± 1.9 h) compared to free-living (2.3 ± 2.0 h;  = 0.036). Despite differences in light exposure, there were no significant differences in objective and subjective sleep parameters between the two conditions. More research is required to better understand behaviours related to light exposure and how this may impact on sleep.