Loading…
Urban Versus Rural Differences in Meeting 24‐h Movement Behaviour Guidelines Among 3–4‐Year‐Olds: An Analysis of SUNRISE Pilot Study Data From 10 Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries
ABSTRACT Background Insufficient physical activity, excessive screen time and short sleep duration among young children are global public health concerns; however, data on prevalence of meeting World Health Organisation 24‐h movement behaviour guidelines for 3–4‐year‐old children in low‐ and middle‐...
Saved in:
Published in: | Child : care, health & development health & development, 2024-11, Vol.50 (6), p.e70008-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Background
Insufficient physical activity, excessive screen time and short sleep duration among young children are global public health concerns; however, data on prevalence of meeting World Health Organisation 24‐h movement behaviour guidelines for 3–4‐year‐old children in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) are limited, and it is unknown whether urbanisation is related to young children's movement behaviours. The present study examined differences in prevalence of meeting 24‐h movement behaviour guidelines among 3–4‐year‐old children living in urban versus rural settings in LMICs.
Methods
The SUNRISE Study recruited 429, 3–4‐year‐old child/parent dyads from 10 LMICs. Children wore activPAL accelerometers continuously for at least 48 h to assess their physical activity and sleep duration. Screen time and time spent restrained were assessed via parent questionnaire. Differences in prevalence of meeting guidelines between urban‐ and rural‐dwelling children were examined using chi‐square tests.
Results
Physical activity guidelines were met by 17% of children (14% urban vs. 18% rural), sleep guidelines by 57% (61% urban vs. 54% rural), screen time guidelines by 50% (50% urban vs. 50% rural), restrained guidelines by 84% (81% urban vs. 86% rural) and all guidelines combined by 4% (4% urban vs.4% rural). We found no significant differences in meeting the guidelines between urban and rural areas.
Conclusions
Only a small proportion of children in both rural and urban settings met the WHO 24‐h movement guidelines. Strategies to improve movement behaviours in LMICs should consider including both rural and urban settings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0305-1862 1365-2214 1365-2214 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cch.70008 |