Loading…

Thyroid avoidance in treatment planning for breast cancer patients irradiated to the supraclavicular nodes

Hypothyroidism affects up to 21% of women with breast cancer after supraclavicular node irradiation. The PENTEC (pediatric normal tissue effects in the clinic) initiative highlighted the need to minimize the thyroid dose, albeit without giving a specific constraint. This study aimed to define a reas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2024-11
Main Authors: Clivio, Alessandro, Zwahlen, Daniel R, Koch, Sonja, Negreanu, Cezarina, Barletta, Enrico, Haerle, Helmut, Hofmann, Elena, Oehler, Christoph
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Hypothyroidism affects up to 21% of women with breast cancer after supraclavicular node irradiation. The PENTEC (pediatric normal tissue effects in the clinic) initiative highlighted the need to minimize the thyroid dose, albeit without giving a specific constraint. This study aimed to define a reasonable target thyroid mean dose (D ) between 10 and 15 Gy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and examine its impact on the hypothyroidism risk. Forty-three breast cancer patients with supraclavicular irradiation neglecting the thyroid in terms of dose protection were included from 01/2020 to 04/2021. An IMRT or VMAT technique was used in 23 and 20 patients, respectively. Replanning aimed for a thyroid D of 10 Gy. IMRT plans still exceeding 10 Gy were converted into VMAT plans. Fisher's sign test compared original and revised plans and the hypothyroidism risk was calculated. Initial radiotherapy plans had a thyroid D of 18.4 ± 7.9 Gy (IMRT: 20.4 ± 8.8 Gy, VMAT: 16.2 ± 6.2 Gy). Replanning significantly reduced D to 10.3 ± 4.5 Gy (-44%) overall (IMRT: -50%, VMAT: -35%), with 56% achieving ≤ 10 Gy (IMRT: 33.3%, VMAT: 61%). Furthermore, an IMRT to VMAT conversion yielded a thyroid D of 9.2 ± 3.5 Gy, with 74.4% of patients ≤ 10 Gy, albeit at the cost of higher doses to the contralateral breast. Clinical and planning target volume (CTV/PTV) coverage remained uncompromised. The calculated hypothyroidism risk significantly decreased from 24.5% to 13.3% (D  = 10 Gy) or 16.3% (D  = 13.5 Gy). Implementing a thyroid organ at risk (OAR) constraint D of 13.5 Gy was feasible in 88% of patients without compromising other OARs and CTV/PTV coverage, and resulted in a 33-46% reduction of the hypothyroidism risk. Retrospectively registered.
ISSN:0179-7158
1439-099X
1439-099X
DOI:10.1007/s00066-024-02321-8