Loading…
Elevated body mass index and obesity are associated with pain-associated psychological distress in patients with hip pain
Introduction Little research has investigated the relationship between musculoskeletal pain and body mass index (BMI) in the context of pain-associated psychological distress. This study aims to determine if independent associations exist between BMI, obesity, demographic variables, and psychologica...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2024-12, Vol.145 (1), p.22, Article 22 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Introduction
Little research has investigated the relationship between musculoskeletal pain and body mass index (BMI) in the context of pain-associated psychological distress. This study aims to determine if independent associations exist between BMI, obesity, demographic variables, and psychological distress in patients presenting with hip pain.
Materials and methods
Using a retrospective cross-sectional study design, 428 patients completed the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) and were categorized into pain-associated psychological distress phenotypes using latent class analysis. Participants were stratified into five BMI categories outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using descriptive statistics. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to determine a relationship between psychological distress phenotype and BMI (first as a continuous variable, then as a categorical variable), age, gender, race, and veteran status as candidate variables.
Results
Four psychological distress phenotypes were generated: high distress (n = 172, 40.2%), low distress (n = 114, 26.6%), negative pain coping (n = 98, 22.9%), and low self-efficacy and acceptance (n = 44, 10.3%). BMI analyses identified 4 participants (0.9%) as being underweight (BMI |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1434-3916 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00402-024-05665-z |