An interprofessional multicomponent intervention to improve end-of-life care in intensive care: A before-and-after study

• Published in: Australian critical care 2024-12, p.101147, Article 101147
• Main Authors: Lovell, Tania, Mitchell, Marion, Powell, Madeleine, Strube, Petra, Tonge, Angela, O’Neill, Kylie, Dunstan, Elspeth, Bonnin-Trickett, Amity, Miller, Elizabeth, Suliman, Adam, Ownsworth, Tamara, Ranse, Kristen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Critical care; End-of-life; End-of-life care; Family-centred care; Intensive care; Nursing
• ISSN: 1036-7314
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101147

The provision of end-of-life care (EOLC) is an ongoing component of practice in intensive care units (ICUs). Interdisciplinary, multicomponent interventions may enhance the quality of EOLC for patients and the experience of family members and ICU clinicians during this period. This study aimed to assess the impact of a multicomponent intervention on EOLC practices in the ICU and family members' and clinicians’ perceptions of EOLC. A before-and-after interventional study design was used. Interventions comprising of EOLC guidelines, environmental and memory-making resources, EOLC education day for nurses, web-based resources, and changes to EOLC documentation processes were implemented in a 30-bed adult tertiary ICU from September 2020 onwards. Data collection included electronic health record audits of care provided post initiation of EOLC and family and clinician surveys. Open-ended survey questions were analysed using content analysis. Data from before and after the intervention were compared using the Chi-squared test for categorical variables, unpaired two-sample t-tests for normally distributed continuous measurements, and Mann–Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed data. A reduction in documented observations and medications and an increased removal of invasive devices unrelated to EOLC were observed post the intervention. The mean overall satisfaction of family members improved from 4.5 to 5 (out of 5); however, this was not statistically significant. Statistically significant improvements in clinicians' perception of overall quality of EOLC (mean difference = 0.28, 95% confidence interval: 0.18, 0.37; t282 = 5.8, P