Loading…
Facile dissociation of CO on Fe{2 1 1}: Evidence from microcalorimetry and first-principles theory
Chemisorption of CO on the Fe{2 1 1} surface is studied within first-principles density functional theory (DFT) and single-crystal adsorption calorimetry (SCAC). The most stable molecular adsorption state corresponds to CO bound in a three-fold site involving one metal atom from the top layer and tw...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surface science 2008-07, Vol.602 (13), p.2325-2332 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Chemisorption of CO on the Fe{2
1
1} surface is studied within first-principles density functional theory (DFT) and single-crystal adsorption calorimetry (SCAC). The most stable molecular adsorption state corresponds to CO bound in a three-fold site involving one metal atom from the top layer and two metal atoms in the second layer. In this configuration, CO is tilted and elongated with a considerably red-shifted stretching frequency (calculated to be 1634
cm
−1 as opposed to 2143
cm
−1 for gas-phase CO). This state is very similar to that of CO on Fe{1
0
0} and Fe{1
1
1}, which is believed to be a precursor state to dissociation at relatively modest temperatures. However, dissociation of CO is found by DFT to be particularly facile on Fe{2
1
1}, with a dissociation barrier noticeably lower than that for CO on Fe{1
0
0} or Fe{1
1
1}. The 300
K coverage-dependent calorimetric data is consistent with either molecular or dissociative adsorption, with an initial adsorption heat of 160
kJ/mol. At higher coverages, the heat of adsorption and sticking probability data exhibit a forced oscillatory behaviour, which can be explained by assuming CO dissociation and subsequent diffusion of atomic carbon and/or oxygen into the substrate. It is argued that conditions for CO dissociation on Fe{2
1
1} are nearly optimal for Fischer–Tropsch catalysis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0039-6028 1879-2758 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.susc.2008.05.014 |