Loading…

Experimental study on drop formation in liquid–liquid fluidized bed

Drop formation in liquid–liquid fluidized bed was investigated experimentally. The normal water was injected via a fine-capillary spray nozzle into the co-flowing No. 25 transformer oil with jet directed upwards in a vertical fluidized bed. Experiments under a wide variety of conditions were conduct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemical engineering science 2009-03, Vol.64 (6), p.1249-1259
Main Authors: Peng, Zhengbiao, Yuan, Zhulin, Wu, Xuan, Cai, Jie, Fan, Fengxian, Tie, Li, Fan, Geng, Pan, Chen, Liang, Kunfeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Drop formation in liquid–liquid fluidized bed was investigated experimentally. The normal water was injected via a fine-capillary spray nozzle into the co-flowing No. 25 transformer oil with jet directed upwards in a vertical fluidized bed. Experiments under a wide variety of conditions were conducted to investigate the instability dynamics of the jet, the size and size distribution of the drops. Details of drop formation, drop flow patterns and jet evolution were monitored in real-time by an ultra-high-speed digital CCD (charge couple device) camera. The Rosin–Rammler model was applied to characterize experimental drop size distributions. Final results demonstrate that drop formation in liquid–liquid system takes place on three absolutely different developing regimes: bubbling, laminar jetting and turbulent jetting, depending on the relative Reynolds number between the two phases. For different flow domains, dynamics of drop formation change significantly, involving mechanism of jet breakup, jet length pulsation, mean size and uniformity of the drops. The jet length fluctuates with time in variable and random amplitudes for a specified set of operated parameters. Good agreement is shown between the drop size and the Rosin–Rammler distribution function with the minimum correlation coefficient 0.9199. The mean drop diameter decreases all along with increasing jet flow rate. Especially after the relative Reynolds number exceeds a certain value about 3.5 × 10 4 , the jet disrupts intensely into multiple small drops with a diameter mainly ranging from 1.0 to 1.5 mm and a more and more uniform size distribution. The turbulent jetting regime of drop formation is the most preferable to the dynamic ice slurry making system.
ISSN:0009-2509
1873-4405
DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2008.11.012