Loading…

Dissolution kinetics of spent petroleum catalyst using two different acidophiles

Leaching studies using spent petroleum catalyst containing Ni, V and Mo were carried out using two different acidophiles, iron oxidizing (IOB) and sulfur oxidizing (SOB) bacteria. XRD analysis proved the existence of V in oxide form, Ni in sulfide form, Mo both in oxide and sulfide forms, and sulfur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrometallurgy 2009-11, Vol.99 (3), p.157-162
Main Authors: Pradhan, Debabrata, Mishra, Debaraj, Kim, Dong J., Chaudhury, G. Roy, Lee, Seoung W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Leaching studies using spent petroleum catalyst containing Ni, V and Mo were carried out using two different acidophiles, iron oxidizing (IOB) and sulfur oxidizing (SOB) bacteria. XRD analysis proved the existence of V in oxide form, Ni in sulfide form, Mo both in oxide and sulfide forms, and sulfur in elemental state. Both bacteria showed similar leaching kinetics at the same leaching parameters, such as pH, nutrient concentration, pulp density, particle size and temperature. The dissolution kinetics for Ni and V was much higher than Mo. Bioleaching kinetics was observed to follow dual rates, initially faster followed by a slower rate. So, dissolution mechanism was based on surface- and pore-diffusion rate. The dissolution process was found to follow 1st order kinetics. Unified dissolution rate kinetics equations were developed using 1st order rate kinetics. Various thermodynamic parameters were also calculated. Rate determining step for both the bacteria were evaluated and the average D 1 (surface) and D 2 (pore) values were found to be around 7 × 10 − 9 and 1 × 10 − 10  cm 2 respectively. The lower value of D 2 suggested that the pore diffusion is the rate determining step during bioleaching process.
ISSN:0304-386X
1879-1158
DOI:10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.07.014