Loading…
Multi-field spacetime discontinuous Galerkin methods for linearized elastodynamics
We extend the single-field spacetime discontinuous Galerkin (SDG) method for linearized elastodynamics of Abedi et al. [1] to multi-field versions. A three-field method, in displacement, velocity and strain, is derived by invoking a Bubnov–Galerkin weighted residuals procedure on the system of space...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 2009-12, Vol.199 (1), p.34-47 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We extend the single-field spacetime discontinuous Galerkin (SDG) method for linearized elastodynamics of Abedi et al.
[1] to multi-field versions. A three-field method, in displacement, velocity and strain, is derived by invoking a Bubnov–Galerkin weighted residuals procedure on the system of spacetime field equations and the corresponding jump conditions. A two-field formulation, in displacement and velocity, and the one-field displacement formulation of
[1] are obtained from the three-field model through strong enforcement of kinematic compatibility relations. All of these formulations balance linear and angular momentum at the element level, and we prove that they are energy-dissipative and unconditionally stable. As in
[1], we implement the SDG models using a causal, advancing-front meshing procedure that enables a patch-by-patch solution procedure with linear complexity in the number of spacetime elements. Numerical results show that the three-field formulation is most efficient, wherein all interpolated fields converge at the optimal,
O
(
h
p
+
1
)
, rate. For a given mesh size, the three-field model delivers error values that are more than an order of magnitude smaller than those of the one- and two-field models. The three-field formulation’s efficiency is also superior, independent of whether the comparison is based on matching polynomial orders or matching convergence rates. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0045-7825 1879-2138 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cma.2009.09.012 |