Characterization and origin of late Devonian illitic clay deposits southwestern Iran

Illitic clay deposits of Esteghlal Mine that represent the largest refractory clay deposit in Iran were subjected to petrographical, mineralogical and geochemical investigations to examine their origin. Geological investigation showed that the illitic clay deposits of Esteghlal Mine intercalated wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied clay science 2008-12, Vol.42 (1), p.318-325
Main Authors: Baioumy, H.M., Gharaie, M.H.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Esteghlal Mine
Exact sciences and technology
Illite
Iran
Late Devonian
Mineralogy
Origin
Silicates
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Illitic clay deposits of Esteghlal Mine that represent the largest refractory clay deposit in Iran were subjected to petrographical, mineralogical and geochemical investigations to examine their origin. Geological investigation showed that the illitic clay deposits of Esteghlal Mine intercalated with limestone beds rich in marine conodonts range in age from early to middle Famennian indicating the deposition of these illite deposits in marine environment during the early to middle Famennian. The deposits are composed mainly of illite with traces of kaolinite. Non-clay minerals are mainly very fine quartz and altered feldspars phenocrysts disseminated the very fine illite matrix. Scanning electron microscope revealed the occurrence of illite as crumbled plates with undefined outlines of sizes around 2 μm. Kaolinite occurs as flakes of deformed morphology and unclear outlines or as curved and bent flakes. These morphologies along with the abundance of detrital quartz and altered feldspars and low crystallinity of illite suggest a detrital origin of these clays. Nb/Y–Zr/TiO 2 discrimination diagram indicated that the studied illitic clay deposits were derived from trachy–andesite source. The relative enrichment of light REE over heavy REE with negative Eu anomalies supports this interpretation. Absence of smectite and illite/smectite mixed layers and detrital nature of illite and kaolinite suggest that illite was formed as a result of hydrothermal alteration of acidic to intermediate igneous rocks then transported to the depositional basin rather than its formation as a result of diagenesis of precursor clays.
ISSN:0169-1317
1872-9053
DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2007.12.003