Discourse on guomin ('the citizen') in late Qing China, 1895-1911

• Published in: Inter-Asia cultural studies 2006-03, Vol.7 (1), p.2-23
• Main Author: Sung-chiao, Shen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: China; Chinese; Citizens; Etymology; Intellectuals; Nation state; National identity; Nationalism; Qing Dynasty; Social status; Sociolinguistics
• ISSN: 1464-9373
• DOI: 10.1080/14649370500463091

The term guomin is found in Chinese texts from an early period. However, as commonly used today - as a modern political concept of special value and significance - guomin belongs to a political vocabulary adopted by Chinese intellectuals in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries from Japan's new usages. The goal of this essay is to explain how this important concept was formed and what it signified. The term guomin has basically conveyed two levels of meaning since the late Qing. In essence, the term is similar to the English word `citizenship', and it reveals a kind of awakening of a new political consciousness on the part of Chinese intellectuals since the late Qing. Through the discourse of guomin, they began to emphasize the subjectivity of each individual in the national political process, along with all of their rights and duties. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, the criticisms and reflections of Chinese intellectuals about traditional politics, society and culture, and thought have basically developed along the lines of the logic of `turning subjects into citizens'. However, the pursuit of a strong nation-state under a civil crisis sparked by foreign pressure marked the historical conditions that generated the modern Chinese guomin discourse. Limited by this kind of `national identity,' the discourse and construction of guomin since the late Qing have never been able to escape the shadow of the state. Under these ideological conditions, guomin could only become a means of the nationalist project for survival; it could never become an autonomous and universal category. Guomin, as it turns out, has been, and still remains, `the people of the state'. Reprinted by permission of Routledge, Taylor and Francis Ltd.