Loading…

Keynes's Z function: a reply to Hartwig and Brady

The author has argued that The General Theory (Keynes, 1936, hereafter GT) extends Marshalls theory of value to the monetary economy, and that the Footnote (GT, pp. 556) can be understood as a statement, not of Keynes's own assumptions throughout the rest of The General Theory, but of the three...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cambridge journal of economics 2008-09, Vol.32 (5), p.811-814
Main Author: Hayes, M. G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The author has argued that The General Theory (Keynes, 1936, hereafter GT) extends Marshalls theory of value to the monetary economy, and that the Footnote (GT, pp. 556) can be understood as a statement, not of Keynes's own assumptions throughout the rest of The General Theory, but of the three special assumptions needed for the Classical marginal productivity theorem to hold, at the macroeconomic as well as the microeconomic level. The author's comments concerning Keynes's Z function are discussed.
ISSN:0309-166X
1464-3545
DOI:10.1093/cje/ben014