Loading…
Keynes's Z function: a reply to Hartwig and Brady
The author has argued that The General Theory (Keynes, 1936, hereafter GT) extends Marshalls theory of value to the monetary economy, and that the Footnote (GT, pp. 556) can be understood as a statement, not of Keynes's own assumptions throughout the rest of The General Theory, but of the three...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cambridge journal of economics 2008-09, Vol.32 (5), p.811-814 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The author has argued that The General Theory (Keynes, 1936, hereafter GT) extends Marshalls theory of value to the monetary economy, and that the Footnote (GT, pp. 556) can be understood as a statement, not of Keynes's own assumptions throughout the rest of The General Theory, but of the three special assumptions needed for the Classical marginal productivity theorem to hold, at the macroeconomic as well as the microeconomic level. The author's comments concerning Keynes's Z function are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0309-166X 1464-3545 |
DOI: | 10.1093/cje/ben014 |