The market reaction to Arthur Andersen's role in the Enron scandal: Loss of reputation or confounding effects?

This paper tests the hypothesis that negative client stock returns following the revelation that Enron documents had been shredded are attributable to confounding effects as opposed to a loss of Andersen's reputation. We find that a sharp decline in oil prices along with differences in the indu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of accounting & economics 2008-12, Vol.46 (2), p.279-293
Main Authors: Nelson, Karen K., Price, Richard A., Rountree, Brian R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accounting
Accounting firms
Arthur Andersen
Auditor reputation
Auditor reputation Arthur Andersen Event studies Earnings response coefficients
Business reputation
Earnings response coefficients
Event studies
Rates of return
Reputations
Scandals
Securities markets
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper tests the hypothesis that negative client stock returns following the revelation that Enron documents had been shredded are attributable to confounding effects as opposed to a loss of Andersen's reputation. We find that a sharp decline in oil prices along with differences in the industry composition of the Andersen and Big 4 client portfolios combine to produce significantly more negative returns for Andersen clients relative to Big 4 clients, and for Andersen's Houston office clients relative to its clients in other locations. The market reaction to two other Enron-related events also offers little support for a reputation effect.
ISSN:0165-4101
1879-1980
DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.09.001