Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: Experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore

This paper examines cultural differences in individual decision-making in a corruption game. We define culture as an individual's accumulated experience, shaped by the social, institutional, and economic aspects of the environment in which the individual lives. Based on experiments run in Austr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of public economics 2009-08, Vol.93 (7), p.843-851
Main Authors: Cameron, Lisa, Chaudhuri, Ananish, Erkal, Nisvan, Gangadharan, Lata
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Australia
Comparative analysis
Corruption
Corruption Experiments Punishment Cultural analysis
Cultural analysis
Cultural influence
Decision making
Experiments
India
Indonesia
Institutions
Punishment
Singapore
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper examines cultural differences in individual decision-making in a corruption game. We define culture as an individual's accumulated experience, shaped by the social, institutional, and economic aspects of the environment in which the individual lives. Based on experiments run in Australia (Melbourne), India (Delhi), Indonesia (Jakarta) and Singapore, we find that there is a greater variation in the propensities to punish corrupt behavior than in the propensities to engage in corrupt behavior across cultures. Consistent with the existing corruption indices, the subjects in India exhibit a higher tolerance of corruption than the subjects in Australia. However, the subjects in Singapore have a higher tolerance and the subjects in Indonesia have much lower tolerance of corruption than expected. We conjecture that this is due to the nature of the recent institutional changes in these two countries. We also vary our experimental design to examine the impact of the perceived cost of bribery and find that the results are culture-specific.
ISSN:0047-2727
1879-2316
DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.004