Legal restrictions and sunspots: A further inquiry on the real-bills doctrine versus the quantity theory debate

This paper argues that economic fluctuations before the Peel’s Bank Act were caused by extrinsic random events relating to possible suspension of convertibility of the Bank of England. We show that there are economies in which (i) sunspot equilibria exist in the absence of the legal restrictions esp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of macroeconomics 2004-09, Vol.26 (3), p.431-442
Main Authors: Chuang, Shi-Feng, Huo, Teh-Ming
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Economic conditions
Economic fluctuations
Economic theory
Legal restrictions
Macroeconomics
Quantity theory
Real-bills doctrine
Studies
Sunspot
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper argues that economic fluctuations before the Peel’s Bank Act were caused by extrinsic random events relating to possible suspension of convertibility of the Bank of England. We show that there are economies in which (i) sunspot equilibria exist in the absence of the legal restrictions espoused by the quantity theory; (ii) the restrictions can be used to eliminate those equilibria; (iii) the proposals of the real-bills doctrine improve the outcomes of the quantity theory restrictions as well as free banking; and (iv) the welfare improvement of the real-bills regime can be accomplished only with the legal restrictions imposed.
ISSN:0164-0704
1873-152X
DOI:10.1016/j.jmacro.2003.02.003