Unconscious semantic categorization and mask interactions: An elaborate response to Kunde et al. (2005)

• Published in: Cognition 2005-08, Vol.97 (1), p.107-113
• Main Authors: Van Opstal, Filip, Reynvoet, Bert, Verguts, Tom
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Classification; Cognition; Cognitive Processes; Consciousness; Contextual influences; Criticism; Experiments; Hoffmann, Joachim; Kiesel, Andrea; Kunde, Wilfried; Language Processing; Masked priming; Number; Semantics; Stimuli
• ISSN: 0010-0277; 1873-7838
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.005

In their original report [Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition, 88, 223–242] maintain that “unconscious stimuli [do not] owe their impact […] to automatic semantic categorization” (p.223), and instead propose the action-trigger theory of unconscious priming. In a reply to our paper [Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2005). On the masking and disclosure of unconscious semantic processing. A reply to Van Opstal, Reynvoet, & Verguts (2005). Cognition], the authors adopt a reconcilist position, and propose that both theories may be valid depending on the experimental situation. We discuss the evidence in favor of this position. [Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2005). On the masking and disclosure of unconscious semantic processing. A reply to Van Opstal, Reynvoet, & Verguts (2005). Cognition] also propose an alternative account of our mask-type blocking hypothesis. We report an experiment that distinguishes between our original and their alternative hypothesis.