Loading…

Balanced inventory of desirable responding: Factor structure, reliability, and validity with an offender sample

The psychometric properties of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) were examined with 539 incarcerated male offenders. Confirmatory factor analysis of the BIDR resulted in a three factor solution of Impression Management, Denial of the Negative, and Over Confident Rigidity with sca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality and individual differences 1996-09, Vol.21 (3), p.323-333
Main Authors: Kroner, Daryl G., Weekes, John R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The psychometric properties of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) were examined with 539 incarcerated male offenders. Confirmatory factor analysis of the BIDR resulted in a three factor solution of Impression Management, Denial of the Negative, and Over Confident Rigidity with scale score coefficient alphas of 0.84, 0.73, and 0.58, respectively. External validity was demonstrated by comparing scale differences (a) between offenders admitting their offences with nonadmitting offenders, (b) intake vs release offenders, and (c) with a theoretically relevant item from Hare's Psychopathy Checklist. To further examine the convergent and discriminant validity, the BIDR scales were compared with other response style measures of Denial, Social Desirability, Person Reliability, number of true keyed responses, and number of false keyed responses derived from the Basic Personality Inventory. Also included was the Satiation Scale, a measure of test taking attitudes. The overall results suggest that the BIDR has utility in the measurement of socially desirable responding with offenders. The implications of these results for interpreting offenders' self-report assessments are discussed.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00079-7