A Methodological Study to Develop and Validate a Death Attitude Scale: Buddhists and Medical Students Compared

This study aimed to develop and validate a death attitude scale which would be applicable to Christians, non-Christians, and atheists alike. A sample of 147 medical students and a sample of 115 Buddhists completed a fifty-six-item questionnaire in order to empirically test generality across samples....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 1999-05, Vol.38 (3), p.211-234
Main Author: Saunders, Sue
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anxiety
Atheism
Attitude measures
Attitude tests
Bias
Buddhism
Buddhists
Christians
Comparison
Death & dying
Death anxiety
Death Attitude Scale
Extinction
Fear & phobias
Medical students
Methodology
Non-Christian
Questionnaires
Reliability
Sampling
Validation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aimed to develop and validate a death attitude scale which would be applicable to Christians, non-Christians, and atheists alike. A sample of 147 medical students and a sample of 115 Buddhists completed a fifty-six-item questionnaire in order to empirically test generality across samples. Four conceptual aspects of death and dying were investigated. The results of three principle components analyses provided evidence for three of the a priori labeled factors: Fear and anxiety about death and dying; Fear and anxiety about personal extinction; and Positive attitude to death and dying. Seventeen items which loaded satisfactorily across both samples were retained for the orthogonal three factor solution. Construct validity was considered to be high and reliability was found to be good. This study provided empirical support for at least two orthogonal factors requiring further attention from thanatological researchers. Results highlighted the importance of sampling non-Christian populations; of sampling populations who have experience of aspects of death and dying and of using questionnaire items which have no religious bias.
ISSN:0030-2228
1541-3764
DOI:10.2190/3Q0V-E9FQ-E55L-UH7R