Loading…
Go Directly to Jail: White Collar Sentencing after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
In 2002, reacting to the devastating collapse of Enron and other major American corporations, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Included in the Act was the White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002 (WCCPA), which sharply increased penalties for various forms of fraud. Unfortunately,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Harvard law review 2009-04, Vol.122 (6), p.1728-1749 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In 2002, reacting to the devastating collapse of Enron and other major American corporations, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Included in the Act was the White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002 (WCCPA), which sharply increased penalties for various forms of fraud. Unfortunately, both the Act and the WCCPA have proven overly rushed and insufficiently prescient to deal with the changing face of business crimes in America. This article argues that a major reason for this result is that judges have reacted to the harsher WCCPA sentences by increasingly departing from the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Part I of this article lays out a basic flaw in modern white collar criminal sentencing, discussing how the current sentencing scheme neither deters crime nor requires a just level of punishment, and is thus an ineffective and perhaps retrograde method of achieving societal goals. Part II proposes two possible reasons that this problem has arisen. Part III proposes several solutions to these problems, including alteration of the loss calculation mechanism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-811X 2161-976X |