The Korean press and Hwang’s fraud

This case study explores why South Korean journalists overlooked allegations of scientific misconduct against South Korean scientist Dr. Woo Suk Hwang and even indirectly defended him in 2005—6. Nineteen journalists, who covered Hwang’s story for five of South Korea’s leading daily newspapers, were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) England), 2009-11, Vol.18 (6), p.653-669
Main Authors: Park, Jaeyung, Jeon, Hyoungjoon, Logan, Robert A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Allegations
Avoidance
Case studies
Ethical standards
Ethics
Fraud
Journalism
Journalists
Judgments
Media coverage
Negotiation
News media
Newsrooms
Norms
Press
Professional misconduct
Public opinion
Risk
Risk perception
Science
Scientists
Social norms
South Korea
Studies
Training
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This case study explores why South Korean journalists overlooked allegations of scientific misconduct against South Korean scientist Dr. Woo Suk Hwang and even indirectly defended him in 2005—6. Nineteen journalists, who covered Hwang’s story for five of South Korea’s leading daily newspapers, were interviewed. The interviewees added insights about the news coverage of the Hwang scandal not identified in previous literature, such as the difficulties among journalists to suspend their personal disbelief about the criticisms and evidence against Hwang. The findings suggest the news judgments that occurred in Korean newsrooms during the Hwang scandal reflected a socially constructed process of negotiation among news media professionals and between journalists and scientists. The findings also suggest it may be best to consider journalistic mores within a multidimensional framework that includes journalistic perceptions of socio-cultural norms, internal newsroom standards for evidence, newsroom competence and training, normative journalism ethics, news gathering techniques, perceived dissonance and professed risk avoidance.
ISSN:0963-6625
1361-6609
DOI:10.1177/0963662508096779